# Parameter transformations
This tutorial builds on the [linear regression
tutorial](01a-lin-reg.md#linear-regression). Here, we demonstrate how to
transform a positive-valued parameter so that it can be sampled with a
NUTS kernel on an unconstrained scale.
First, let’s set up the linear regression model again. The
data-generating process and the model structure are the same as in the
[linear regression tutorial](01a-lin-reg.md#linear-regression), but this
time we prepare the model for joint NUTS sampling of the regression
coefficients and the error variance.
``` python
import jax
import jax.numpy as jnp
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
# We use distributions and bijectors from tensorflow probability
import tensorflow_probability.substrates.jax.distributions as tfd
import tensorflow_probability.substrates.jax.bijectors as tfb
import liesel.goose as gs
import liesel.model as lsl
rng = np.random.default_rng(42)
# data-generating process
n = 500
true_beta = np.array([1.0, 2.0])
true_sigma = 1.0
x0 = rng.uniform(size=n)
X_mat = np.c_[np.ones(n), x0]
y_vec = X_mat @ true_beta + rng.normal(scale=true_sigma, size=n)
# Model
# Part 1: Model for the mean
beta_prior = lsl.Dist(tfd.Normal, loc=0.0, scale=100.0)
beta = lsl.Var.new_param(
value=np.array([0.0, 0.0]),
dist=beta_prior,
name="beta",
inference=gs.MCMCSpec(gs.NUTSKernel, kernel_group="1"),
)
X = lsl.Var.new_obs(X_mat, name="X")
mu = lsl.Var(lsl.Calc(jnp.dot, X, beta), name="mu")
# Part 2: Model for the standard deviation
a = lsl.Var(0.01, name="a")
b = lsl.Var(0.01, name="b")
sigma_sq_prior = lsl.Dist(tfd.InverseGamma, concentration=a, scale=b)
sigma_sq = lsl.Var.new_param(value=10.0, dist=sigma_sq_prior, name="sigma_sq")
sigma = lsl.Var(lsl.Calc(jnp.sqrt, sigma_sq), name="sigma")
# Observation model
y_dist = lsl.Dist(tfd.Normal, loc=mu, scale=sigma)
y = lsl.Var(y_vec, dist=y_dist, name="y")
```
Now let’s try to sample the regression coefficients $\boldsymbol{\beta}$
and the variance $\sigma^2$ with a single NUTS kernel. NUTS operates on
unconstrained real-valued parameters, whereas $\sigma^2$ must remain
positive. We therefore biject `sigma_sq` with an exponential bijector.
This creates an unconstrained latent variable representing
$\log(\sigma^2)$ and keeps `sigma_sq` as the positive back-transformed
value. Both `beta` and the transformed variance receive NUTS inference
specifications with the same `kernel_group`, so Goose samples them
jointly in one NUTS block.
``` python
sigma_sq.biject(tfb.Exp(), inference=gs.MCMCSpec(gs.NUTSKernel, kernel_group="1"))
model = lsl.Model(y)
model.plot()
```
liesel.model.model - WARNING - Inconsistent log prob decomposition: Model.log_prob=-1177.35 ≠ (Model.log_lik=0.00 + Model.log_prior=-15.72).
liesel.model.model - WARNING - Var(name="y") has a distribution but Var.parameter=False and Var.observed=False.
The response distribution still requires the standard deviation on the
original scale. The model graph shows that `sigma_sq` is now a
deterministic, positive-valued transformation of its unconstrained
latent variable. The standard deviation `sigma` is then computed as
`sqrt(sigma_sq)`, so the likelihood continues to receive a valid scale
parameter.
Now we can set up and run the MCMC algorithm directly from the
`MCMCSpec` objects stored in the model. We also include `sigma_sq` in
the stored positions, because the NUTS kernel itself samples the
transformed variable, while `sigma_sq` is the easier quantity to
interpret.
``` python
results = gs.LieselMCMC(model).run_for_epochs(
seed=1,
num_chains=4,
adaptation=1000,
posterior=1000,
positions_included=["sigma_sq"],
)
```
liesel.goose.builder - WARNING - No jitter functions provided for position keys 'h(sigma_sq)', 'beta'. The initial values for these keys won't be jittered
liesel.goose.engine - INFO - Initializing kernels...
liesel.goose.engine - INFO - Done
liesel.goose.engine - INFO - Starting epoch: FAST_ADAPTATION, 100 transitions, 25 jitted together
0%| | 0/4 [00:00
We can also take a look at the summary table, which includes both the
original $\sigma^2$ and the transformed $\log(\sigma^2)$.
``` python
gs.Summary(results)
```
Parameter summary:
|
|
|
kernel
|
mean
|
sd
|
q_0.05
|
q_0.5
|
q_0.95
|
sample_size
|
ess_bulk
|
ess_tail
|
rhat
|
|
parameter
|
index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beta
|
(0,)
|
kernel_00
|
0.980
|
0.090
|
0.830
|
0.982
|
1.127
|
4000
|
841.545
|
986.330
|
1.002
|
|
(1,)
|
kernel_00
|
1.915
|
0.158
|
1.661
|
1.915
|
2.178
|
4000
|
750.169
|
986.009
|
1.002
|
|
h(sigma_sq)
|
()
|
kernel_00
|
0.040
|
0.063
|
-0.060
|
0.039
|
0.145
|
4000
|
5414.602
|
3247.635
|
1.001
|
|
sigma_sq
|
()
|
\-
|
1.043
|
0.066
|
0.941
|
1.040
|
1.156
|
4000
|
5414.611
|
3247.635
|
1.001
|
Acceptance probabilities:
|
|
|
|
acceptance_probability
|
position_moved
|
|
kernel
|
positions
|
phase
|
|
|
|
kernel_00
|
h(sigma_sq), beta
|
posterior
|
0.868
|
NaN
|
|
warmup
|
0.792
|
NaN
|
Error summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
count
|
sample_size
|
sample_size_total
|
relative
|
|
kernel
|
positions
|
error_code
|
error_msg
|
phase
|
|
|
|
|
|
kernel_00
|
h(sigma_sq), beta
|
1
|
divergent transition
|
warmup
|
47
|
4000
|
4000
|
0.012
|
|
posterior
|
0
|
4000
|
4000
|
0.000
|
Finally, let’s check the autocorrelation of the samples.
``` python
gs.plot_cor(results)
```
